ontology: (Default)
i. So, Dad came upstairs a few minutes ago to tell me that, "oh, there's going to be a Beowulf movie...with Angeline Jolie." We sort of stared at each other in an "o-kay" sort of way, and he said something about Robert Zemeckis directing, "so it might be good, because he's really brilliant," (not that I would know; I am not so well-versed in directors and I had to ask, and apparently he directed Forest Gump and Who Framed Roger Rabbit and some other stuff, which all seems about as far from Beowulf as, well...Angelina Jolie) and I'm still thinking Angeline Jolie? In Beowulf? Angeline Jolie?, because, seriously, who is there for Angelina Jolie to play? And then I thought, oh, oh, sweet Arda, is this the same Beowulf movie that Neil Gaiman did the script for? (Because there could be two totally different Beowulf films coming out in one year. Really!) So, after Dad wanders back downstairs, I had to look it up to see for myself, or I'd sit up all night trying to reconcile the two vastly different worlds of Angelina Jolie and Beowulf

I looked it up, and it is. (Right. Like I said, two Beowulf films in one year?) Robert Zemeckis, Neil Gaiman, and Angeline Jolie. As Grendel's mother. Angeline Jolie is going to play an underwater hag. I am thunderstruck, I tell you. Also, the movie is reportedly going to be done with motion-capture technology: i.e., it's all going to be animated. ("Like The Polar Express," the article said, and all I'm saying is that the animation had better be better than The Polar Express, which may have been a technical wonder, but the animation was dead boring.) 

My conclusion? This film is either going to be completely brilliant or fantastically awful.

ii. I am updating Ink & Chocolate, my Vox, every single day now. Or every weekday, anyway. It is for Scholastic Purposes. It is also rather rambly and probably sort of dull, but pop in to read once in a while, won't you? There are Bookish Thoughts. And right now there is costume-squee.
ontology: (Default)

Here, have some overdue linkage. 

i. 20000-Names.com. I found this when Googling for the meaning of the name Nox (I knew it, but I wanted to be sure), and it looks to be an excellent resource, despite it sort of being Made of Banner Advertisements. You can search for names by nationality, which isn't anything special, as Behind the Name has, I'm sure, a vaster database (and is prettier and ad-less!), and, more interestingly, you can also search for names by particular categories of meaning--dark names, colour names, moon names, and various other sections with titles in varying degrees of silliness. What you get are names with meanings relating to your category from a rather decent amount of languages (depending on your category). So, 'dream names' gets me Ialu, an Egyptian name meaning 'field of dreams', Gaelic Aisling ('dream, vision'), and Hungarian Almos ('dreamy; sleepy' or 'the dreamt one'), among others. It's not always your best bet for things, but when you're looking for a name with a particular symbolic meaning (especially for minor characters, who I am rubbish at naming out of thin air), it's a rather nice source. (Also, there are, like, a billion 'wolf names'. That? Was me, stifling a chortle.) 

ii. International Children's Digital Library. I'm kind of fangirling this right now, actually. In a nutshell, it's got children's books from all over the world that are either in the public domain, or they've somehow got permission to publish scans online. Some of these books are gloriously, exquisitely old--I've been skimming this 1910 publication of Celtic Tales by Louey Chisholm with very 1910 illustrations by Katherine Cameron. There seem to be a lot of folktales and fairy tales and the like, now that I'm looking. It appears that a substantial amount of these scans comes from the Library of Congress. And, gorblimey, some of these books are age-spotted and weathered and they must smell magnificent up close. If you like old books or children's literature, you really ought to poke about and find something to read. 


I'm kind of not doing anything productive at the moment. Argh. Still trying to write and failing rather dismally. Oh, well, today was rather cosy, anyway.

ontology: (Default)
The news of the moment?

We've got a kitten!

My father currently works with special-needs students, and one of his clients' families, I gather, had kittens to get rid of. He brought most of them to the shelter run by a friend's wife, but kept one--he says it's an early Christmas present. I am an absolute girl around cats--I adore them madly, and our little kitten is so bedimmed adorable: I think one would be hard-pressed to find someone who didn't go 'awww!' a little, at least inside, at the sight of him. He is perfectly black, down to his wee little nose; and tiny and soft and very curious and a little bit nervous just now.

Now the real test will be to see how he and our other cat, Roscoe, react to each other. Roscoe is a very mellow and friendly cat (bit of a pushover, really), and this kitty seems awfully quiet and friendly, too--we'll see.


Also, Wordie is the current Best Thing Ever. I am right here, and still sorting out categories, so it's a bit disorganised. But: egad! wordlists! Combining three of my favourite things: words, lists, and community! Squee!!
ontology: (Default)
Well, I'm not feeling so excellent today, although we took a trip to the library--I was going to say 'and despite the fact that I have been nicking bits of my Very Moist Gingerbread and began the day with coffeecake', but that might actually be a factor. My brain goes all gluey when I overeat. (That gingerbread is good stuff, though. I can't help myself.)

I am, however, almost finished uploading my new Pride & Prejudice moodtheme. *geeky squee*

The real purpose of this post is, though (I think): has anyone got some good Remus/Tonks fanart recs? Because I'm actually almost finished working the kinks out of my fanmix, and I'd like to use artwork for the cover, and I can't find much--or, rather, I have almost no idea how to begin looking. (One of my favourite pieces is, unfortunately, not to be Used, and I'd hunt it up for you lot, except it might take hours. --Never mind, this is it. Remus isn't quite right, but Tonks nearly is, and I love the mood of it and the soft colours. It's a bit in Ellaine's gallery; I absolutely adore her art and wish she would illustrate a book of mine someday. She's also done Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, and Howl's Moving Castle art, as well as scads and scads of original pieces, all of which are brilliant, seriously.)
ontology: (Default)
You know you are losing your touch when:

You write approximately half of a fic you have been trying to write without any success for about a month. You go to bed, and by the next morning have no memory of having done this.

Yeah.

Also? I have been procrastinating about this for quite a while, because I'm sort of worried that if I talk about it too much, I will have to write it, and if I write it, it will EAT MY BRAIN, and [livejournal.com profile] tuesday_skyline will disappear into The Black Hole of Banui Where Stories Go To Die. However, Skyline seems to be going strong (too strong! ack! despite the fact that it is still missing a plot), and I really can't procrastinate much longer, or one of these days I'm going to make a reference to the bloody thing and no-one will understand what I mean and think I've gone mental(er).

So, the Story That Ate My Brain. I suppose you've all gathered by now that this is a work of fiction. What you do not know is as follows: Once upon a time there was a copper-haired librarian named Evangeline. In her spare time, and mostly by accident, she hunted vampires. Then there's this whole theorising on the actual nature of vampires, because I can't buy the idea of anything that used to be human being soulless and utterly irredeemable. (Neither can Evangeline. This leads to Interesting Things. I have no idea what they are, though.) This sort of stemmed, in a way, from my frustration with gothic novels and how they're either mocking the cliches and, while being utterly delightful, just don't have enough of that dark-cathedral asethetic I'm craving, or they are stupid and contrived and have teenagers in them and I want to throw things at them. (I haven't read the actual content of most of these, just the summaries and, occasionally, Amazon reviews.) Then the rest of this happened because Evangeline hopped into my brain and attempted mutiny. Apparently, she lives in 1913 or so. She's been rabbiting on about odd things like the dark and...I seem to remember something about brooches or something equally mundane recently. I don't write it down (it's too weird), i.e., I don't remember it. We're going to have a nasty row about this eventually, I'm sure: she'll tell me in biting tones that something tangled up in a long spiel about winter or organising books was Very Important and I ought to have paid attention.

Getting headache. Must go read. (I am aware that the one does not necessarily cure the other.)



P.S.: I could do this for hours. Yes, really.
ontology: (Default)
Item I: [livejournal.com profile] lady_moriel linked me to this, and it is Awesome. Seriously.

Item II: Since we're on the topic of superheroes, another question, because I am stucker than stuck: What do you think would be a really awesome (and scientifically plausible) superpower?

Item III: I feel like a dead thing that has died. Also, a colony of nose dwarves are tunnelling through my sinuses with dull spoons. BLEHHH.

Item IV: There's a new [livejournal.com profile] tuesday_skyline bit up. Yes, I am a lazy git: did you need to ask?

September 2009

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6 789 101112
13 141516 17 1819
20 21 2223242526
27 282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 08:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios