ontology: (Default)
My parents and I nearly watched Pan's Labyrinth tonight (nearly, because our cantankerous eight-year-old DVD player hated it even more than it usually hates things, although Yvaine is completely fine with it; we plan on nicking the one from church because every other DVD we try to play skips like mad, even straight out of the case), and the trailers in front of it were so disjointed in subject matter and sometimes downright weird that it got me to thinking. Trailers I remember -- the deeply weird-looking Fur with Nicole Kidman as some surrealist photographer and Robert Downey Jr. as some guy with too much hair, this neo-horror film in which there are Shenanigans in the Operating Room, and... some film about some salsa singer with J.Lo's boyfriend? (One of these things...) Okay. And the fact that these films only tangentially related to Pan's Labyrinth as a genre film led me to realise afresh that what we need in filmmaking? Is speculative fiction.

I'm not talking about Fantasy, or Science-Fiction. We've got a fair amount of good sci-fi/fantasy films lately, and I like or love a lot of them -- The Lord of the Rings, of course; Stardust; Serenity. I'm talking about the subtle stuff, the stuff that blurs the lines. The stuff that mightn't end up in the sci-fi section of your local video store (funny how we say that when they are neither exactly stores nor do they carry many videos anymore -- and doesn't everyone just Netflix or download these days?), but would probably be in the fantasy section of the bookstore. Like Pan's Labyrinth. Like the multi-layered Wings of Desire, or the is-it-or-isn't-it of The Illusionist and The Prestige. Films that ask questions, that explore worlds, that explore our world, illuminate it, or wonder how it might be different -- which is why I like the term speculative fiction over sci-fi or fantasy. It can be both. It can be either. It can be something that doesn't fall neatly into either category (a book like Einstein's Dreams, or my apocalypse short story). Most importantly, it speculates. It imagines. It blooms with possibility, with wondering. It tries, often, to understand our world through a lens of imagination.

Film is wonderfully suited to this sort of storytelling, too, because it's so visual -- you don't have to tell us what your alternate London looks like: you let the camera swoop around and we take it all in, delightedly. (Side note: one of my favourite things about the Harry Potter films, though they tend to fluctuate wildly in quality, sometimes over the course of just one film -- anyway, I really, really love the visual representation of the wizarding world, the stuff that just goes on in the background, like in Half-Blood Prince, when we go into Fred and George's shop, and it's just... I wanted to clap and laugh. Perfect.) Sometimes that's more powerful. You can have half-insect humanoids wander past the screen, or buildings made of old rubbish, or streetlamps lit with magic. You can use the camera inventively, show dreamworlds, magic, strange beings, trains of thought, alternate universes... You don't even necessarily need a large budget for this sort of film; the otherness of a world can be communicated through camera movement, colours, music, dialogue. (Side note mark two: we watched Jean Cocteau's 1946 Beauty and the Beast the other night, and oh the special effects. Sure, it's 1946, they're primitive by today's standards -- but they're magical. There's a real tactile, imaginative, clever brilliance about them that digital effects just do not and cannot have.)

In conclusion, because this isn't really an essay exactly... I want more. Maybe I've got to make it, though that seems sort of daunting and terrifying. (Not half so much in writing, because the path's a little more well-trod, and also because books cost nothing to write except sleep and sanity and the cost of researchy books and chocolates and baguettes and cheese and coffee, and you don't need a whole load of other people just to get the bones of it.) 

Next time on Not-Quite-Essays With Banui: the much-debated dynamics of Urban Fantasy, because this is a subject close to my writerly heart.
ontology: (Default)
Attention particularly to [livejournal.com profile] goddessreason: there is a film coming out in September about John Keats and Fanny Brawne, and it looks spiffing. Unfortunately neither of them are vampires in it (no word on Byron however), but one cannot have everything, I suppose.

The sun went down yesterday in a tangle of after-storm clouds and a pale bloom of light, and the rain-rimmed window glowed with it. Later outside was dark and the sky dark-water blue and still cloud-wracked, though the rain was drying. Oh, how I love weather.

And in other good news, the first draft of the first chapter of the Evangeline story is finished; I finished it while on holiday. It needs a once-over and I absolutely must edit a handful of passages that I loathe and despise, but it will be going up on [livejournal.com profile] balladrie as promised: very soon, actually. And by "very soon" I actually mean "it's up now". (Friends only, as it's My Novel, but if any of you haven't friended [livejournal.com profile] balladrie, just do so now and I'll friend you back before you can say... something really short. Unless I am sleeping.) A great deal of new things have snuck in, including a sudden and startling revelation I had in the car: the dead woman on the library steps is not a warning, an accident, or a sign: she's a ritual. I don't know what for yet (perhaps to weaken the threshold ward on the library?), but things make a lot more sense now because I never really knew what she was there for. It's not made clear in the first chapter, though, because the characters don't know at that point. So.

Anyway, Mr Caruthers' Sordid Past! (Someday, I will start a band with this name. It will be brilliant.) Was reading a mostly-entirely unrelated novel when a passing concept sparked a bit of storyknowledge in me, which led to a new set of circumstances, namely: Mr Caruthers spent a year or more living in thrall to group of vampires, supplying them with blood in exchange for learning black magics; was probably about twenty or so at the time. Originally entered contract because of vampire woman he fancied himself in love/lust with. He finds himself in rather an awful situation (what did you expect, you pillock? learning black magics from vampires will lead to nothing good!) but can’t escape. (Do vampires want his blood particularly for something, besides willing blood/memory donor/connection to humankind? Does Mr Caruthers have some sort of special power/ability/lineage? Special capacity for magic?) Eventually the Vampire Division finds and liberates him and make a deal not to charge him with various offences, including use of illegal black magics, consorting with vampires (yes, probably a prison-able offence), various things he was probably something of an accomplice to, and things he did and got away with before entering into thrall -- if he uses his personal understanding of the vampire mindset in their service pretty much forever, whenever they feel like calling on him. Mr Caruthers takes over a library, becomes a recluse in spectacles and tweed and a painfully messy office, and eventually hires a fetching copper-haired assistant librarian.

By the time the story beings, it’s been ten? seven? thirteen? years since Mr Caruthers was released. Some kind of unrest is stirring in the vampire community -- something to do with the Industrial Revolution? Pre-WWI whisperings? Vampires feel threatened, which leads them to try to perform some sort of ritual? Which involves Mr Caruthers as a teind, because he was once a functioning part of their community, or because in their twisted mindset they consider it a sort of honour? Or because he betrayed the community by killing some of them in his bid for escape and/or fed information to the Department? They think they are allowing him to redeem himself by being their sacrifice? The ritual takes place on All Hallows Eve, of course, the story being rather demanding, and my subconscious so determined to put in little hints of Tam-Lin everywhere.

Good heavens, my subconscious is such a bizarre place.

(And yes, really, I do promise to talk about Nova Scotia! Only things keep getting in the way.)
ontology: (Default)
Dear me, it seems that I forgot to let you lot know that I wasn't sick anymore. My apologies. I woke Saturday morning with no sign I had ever been sick, except for the massive ugly bruise on my thigh from the mysterious swooning spell, and five hours of pay I won't be seeing in my next paycheck. Sigh. And of course my body hasn't seen fit to warn me that while it appears to be absolutely as normal, it isn't actually ready to digest meat. Or sweets. Bah. (No vomiting or anything that unpleasant, just a lot of feeling vastly uncomfortable after meals, and being stubborn and feeling uncomfortable again.) 

Oh, I must tell you all what a lovely film Babette's Feast is -- Mum and I watched it yesterday evening. I was expecting to like it a bit, but sometimes older foreign films are harder to get into, I think, so I was also expecting to have to work at it a little. (A lot of my favourite films are older foreign films, it is true -- Wings of Desire, The Seventh Seal, Truly Madly Deeply if British counts as foreign! -- but it's still a very difficult genre.) And then it turned out to be utterly engrossing and charming and delightful! It's narrated, which gives it the air of a fable, and it's got such a gentle -- yet pointed -- and wry, good-hearted humour, and the visuals are lovely and simple, and it's terribly funny and touching. I found myself reminded a bit of L.M. Montgomery -- the story sounded as though it could have been one of her short stories, if she wrote about Denmark rather than Canada -- and a bit of Eva Ibbotson, and a bit of a quieter, less flamboyantly fantastical Amelie, and it's exactly the sort of film I would want to watch when I am sick, or sad, or just need to be quietly cosy. (It's also one of those period films that you don't think of as a period film, because everything seems so... absolutely organic.)

Feeling a bit undermotivated today; it's been a bit of a wasted day. I find I don't actually want to read any of the books I checked out from the library on Saturday, and am re-reading Robert K. Massie's biography of Nicholas and Alexandra Romanov instead. Missed a dose of Zoloft yesterday, which might have something to do with my mood (worry not; have acquired a refill); in general I've been a bit restless today -- restless and listless, which is especially uncomfortable. At least I have things to look forward to -- we are making summer plans, and I am beginning to be very excited about them. And I've acquired a bank account at long last, and must only wait for my debit card to come in the post. I am especially eager for this, as I would very much like to a) renew my paid account, and b) buy a completely working laptop of my very own. I have nearly settled on one, and the more I think about having it, and it being portable and working properly and utterly mine, the more I long to have it this very minute! (Oh, to watch DVDs in privacy! And to have a screen of proper brightness, and which doesn't need to be propped up! And battery power! And iTunes again! And wireless again again!) 
ontology: (Default)
I have been telling myself, very firmly and resolutely, to list the things I don't like about my job, lest I get too carried away with enjoying it, and... unspecified bad things happen. Not dwell on them, mind, just -- keep them in mind. To help me along, as it were, today I was introduced to the saddest task I have ever been asked to complete thus far.

I. destroyed. books.

I feel like a murderer.

I have betrayed my sacred duty as protector and advocate of book-kind!

Apparently The Company has a great massive list of things they have decided are not selling, and therefore we must remove them from our shelves and send them back. I scan every single book with some sort of device (it goes 'whirrrring!' when there's stuff), and mostly it just beeps, but every couple of shelves it makes a great racket and then I know I have to dispose of the book I have just scanned. The hardcovers and the nice paperbacks are simply placed on a cart, where they do look forlorn, but at least they are going back to somewhere, perhaps to bargain bins, or to the publishers. The cheap mass market paperbacks, however, we are ordered to strip. Which is a clinical euphemism for brutally ripping off their front covers and tossing them into a box to be thrown out.

(All right, and it isn't only the book lover in me that rebels at this wanton destruction: I was raised not to waste things, ever, at all, and to understand the value of everything, and destroying perfectly good merchandise is wrong. I wish we could at least send them off someplace to be recycled, instead of to moulder in a landfill somewhere.) 

In happier news, I am scheduled to work two days next week, instead of the one I've been getting, and... my name is no longer at the bottom of the schedule list. Which is probably somehow telling? I've been moved up to right beneath the managers and key-holders. People who have worked jobs before, this is good, yes? 
* * *

Yesterday the gang & I finally finished Coraline, and it was very very lovely and wonderful and Mr Gaiman should be proud (which I am certain he is, after reading blog and Twitter entries on the subject), and stop-motion animation is fabulous, and imagination is fabulous, and how did they make fire on the candles sakhghg, and alas, I do still have the niggling complaint that they shouldn't have changed the setting to America, rather than Britain, but that is niggley and due mostly to my extreme Anglophilia. (Also, the fact that everything is tiny and real fills me with glee. Sets! Which are real, and filled with real tiny hand-made props!) 

And then I came home and my family was gone and the only member left (Timmy, on the computer) had no idea where they were. Which is to be expected, as he never remembers such things, and I had a vague memory of Mum planning to go shopping, but it was still a very eerie and hilarious coincidence.

I feel rather tired and smushy and blank; I hope bed and book will cure much of this.

(Also, take note of my glorious new layout, courtesy of [livejournal.com profile] midenianscholar's [livejournal.com profile] scholarslayouts. I've tweaked the fonts a wee bit, but otherwise it is all her masterpiece: all hail Alyssa!)
ontology: (Default)
I would say that this is exactly the sort of thing that would only ever happen to me, except that there were five other people with me at the time. Just when I find myself looping through a particular bad spot of disliking the general texture of my life, I am reminded why it is awesome -- the lesson was meant to be "my friends are made of shiny, shiny win", but it is knit over with a heavy dose of "really hilariously, marvellously surreal things seem to happen to me a lot" (and then I realise that people who are not me would probably consider the following adventure extremely irritating and disheartening, so I am not sure why I was blessed with the good humour to see it as a bizarre sort of boon).

Jonathan has been Mysterious recently, which culminated today in me being spirited away, and a lot of other people, some of whom are very smug young children not related to me, were very Knowing about it. I am really quite surprised that he never once twirled his moustache (Jonathan, I mean, not the Young Child). Shame on you, Jonathan! But I digress, and am skipping over bits of the story I might have drawn out more but am no longer interested in doing (Mum leaves for errands! the house goes mad! Leandra removes her diaper and gets excrement everywhere!). Anyway, Jonathan and I went to get a hasty bite to eat, which ended up being at Luigi's down the street, as we had very little time (there are other people involved!, I was told, and they've got schedules too!), and so what we had for dinner was the free bread and some mozzarella sticks, which were very good, and had much merry conversation, and Jonathan checked with his associates a lot. Hmph.

And then Meholicks came to fetch us and we climbed into the lumbering great van and set off for places unknown, although it was suggested that I might be getting thrown off a bridge. But it was a car-ride! With my favourite people! Except those of whom have departed our fair company for other shores (sadface). And to the darkest jungle! Or Clarion, as it turned out, where there is a cinema, and what was playing thereat that wasn't playing at our paltry excuse for a cinema was Coraline, and I was very happy and thrilled and delighted and very glad I put on my cameo brooch before going out.

The first half of Coraline, I can happily attest, is magnificent and funny and deliciously detailed and full of things that seem particularly designed to ensnare me in particular. And stop-motion animation! And details! Oh lovely lovely sets and costumes and bits and pieces and the fact that Coraline's fingernails are painted makes me ridiculously happy, for some reason. And the score! The score! It's magnificent, is what it is. I was quite enraptured.

The Other Mother has just asked Coraline if she wouldn't love to stay here forever, when -- all of a sudden! -- someone shouts something. Not in the film. In our cinema. We all bristled, I think -- someone's being loud! Shut him up, we're trying to watch! Except what he was shouting was this: "EVERYBODY EVACUATE!" And: "YOU HAVE TO LEAVE IMMEDIATELY." Why? Well, because, "THE BATHROOM IS ON FIRE."

Somewhat perturbed, and, at least on my part, pushing back severe disbelief, we fumbled for coats and things and made our slow way out. "Wait, the bathrooms are on fire? Really? No, really? But... but... the film... the bathrooms are on fire?"

There was actually a vague scent of Something Burning by the time we pushed out into the lobby, though more rubbery than smoky, and, still not entirely knowing what we were doing nor why, we wandered into the main area of the mall (it's a cinema-inside-a-mall), which, as it was late at night, was fairly deserted, except for a few wayward shoppers craning their necks and saying things like, "the bathroom is on fireReally?" 

And then we laughed. Very, very, very hard.

On my part, at least, I find the entire situation completely hilarious and surreal and am not really irritated by it at all, though I want to see the rest of the film terribly. I am very glad that I feel this way, because it makes things more convenient and comfortable. I think the rest of us had much the same reaction -- Sarah and Jonathan were Twittering it -- we couldn't stop laughing! It was so surreal! And so anticlimactic! Really, the bathroom caught fire? The bathroom? Not the seats in back of us or the projector or one of the other theatres or -- most dramatically of all -- the screen, melting in on itself while we all stare at it blankly and mutter things like, "that was certainly a spectacular effect", and "...how very... existentialist", until someone says, "is anyone else terribly hot and can't breathe?" 

(Also, Spike and Angel were totally there. And arguing over who got to save everybody until someone else did the saving for them. Except that Spike was rather more than a little inebriated and apparently trying to bite people. "Spike! WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO THAT POOR WOMAN?!" "Saving her, you great ponce!" "...With your mouth?") 

And then the cinema gave us Emergency Tickets so that we can come again -- they had a whole great roll of them on hand, all ready, which does not bode well for their record of having people finish films the first time they go. And we went home, and some of us (namely me) would suddenly burst out laughing and shaking their heads: "The bathroom! Is on fire!" (Also, it may have been trolls. They can't tell us the bathroom's full of barely contained trolls! No-one would believe them!) And: I think that Neil Gaiman would be deeply amused by today's antics.

My life, it is so surreal.
ontology: (Default)
Foremost on the list of Things Which Would Be Nice About Now is: a fire. Possibly in the middle of my bedroom floor, so long as it is safely contained and not likely to burn anything it isn't supposed to (thereby rendering us unable to get our deposit back), and, primarily, warm and cosy. I could roast marshmallows. Or tasty sausages. Or, more importantly, my hands, which keep having to be reminded that, yes, they do have nerves in them. (I got a pair of fingerless gloves WITH FINGERS yesterday however; we will see where this takes us. Why do they still call them fingerless when they've got half-fingers? Or do those not count as fingers? Anyway, they let less air in and are quite rocking.) 

I've been having difficulty motivating myself to post, not because there is Some Great Dire Thing or because I have a ridiculously complicated thing to write out, but... because I have been. Well, I've had difficulty motivating myself to do much of anything lately (moreso than usual, I mean, which is to say BAD). Ugh. I seem to be rather more depressed than I am actually noticing.

So, Rabbit Hole Day! That was fun; I'm glad you all liked it; it was fun to write. I was feeling a bit sad, because I had jumped on the bandwagon really late at night, so I thought that nobody I knew would be able to do it, but three of you did! and it was marvellous! 

Here is [livejournal.com profile] sartorias' entry, from which I learned of this holiday (and gorblimey, is it gorgeous). And here are other people's entries that she gathered. (She is, by the way, the fantastic author Sherwood Smith, and her blog is a delicious repository of stimulating discussion and thought.) And, on my own f-list: [livejournal.com profile] lady_moriel's elevator takes her to unexpected places; [livejournal.com profile] aohdwyn learns a new way to make cupcakes; and [livejournal.com profile] cails runs into a mysterious stranger. I think this is the best holiday ever, and I should absolutely do it again next year, even if everyone will know by then. (It's a really fascinating exercise, too, especially trying to make it believeable in the beginning, drawing on elements of your actual life and seeing how you can develop them into something fantastical or surreal. I loved that I already had this practically mythological Mysterious Boy, too. It was great. Also, I have learned decided, he is almost certainly Tam Lin, but Janet is not, alas, me; Janet is the pretty red-headed girl at the bakery he was so often conversing with.) 

Stuff Which Has Happened: acquired warm fingerless gloves, had a grand time with Jonathan and then Jonathan + gang having stimulating discussions, making peppermint patties (messy beyond all reason, but delicious), and watching The Dark Knight, which... I somehow forgot how excellent a film it is. I really, really love Christopher Nolan's directing (someday I ought to see Memento, too), although it's difficult for his films to be personal favourites because they're sort of -- distant? I don't love Nolan the filmmaker in nearly the same way that I love Joe Wright and Mira Nair. It's difficult to quantify, because they do get very intimate -- I like that Dark Knight gets involved enough in characters and motivations that it doesn't lose itself in a sea of Epicness, and The Prestige (magic! science! Victoriana! NON-LINEAR TIME!) is full of the small human moments that I love, but they're still -- cold? I love them, but at the same time we both hold each other at arm's length. Hmm. But blimey, I think my favourite thing of all of my favourite things about his films is the way they're cut together. He juxtaposes scenes and cuts away from scenes in ways that are gorgeous and right and sometimes very unsettling -- often he cuts away in the middle of some kind of explosive action, so that you find yourself holding your breath.

Have not been writing much. Should look to this, yes. I am trying to at least get one complete and reasonably organised chapter of the Evangeline story written -- and am also attempting to apply Occam's razor to plot theories (in its most simplified and condensed form: the simplest solution is probably the answer), which may even get me somewhere (! -- ?). Perhaps perhaps. Only there seems to be no simplest answer to 'why are vampires suddenly specifically a threat?', does there? Why do all of my favourite storygerms come with such convoluted plots? My muse ought to know that I am very bad at this.

And! Vienna Teng has got a music video at last, for 'Gravity', and it is lovely and fascinating and good heavens what a completely marvellous dress she has got. My favourite thing, though, is the joy in her face when she sings. Oh Vienna.
ontology: (Default)
more silly nano ramblings; read at your own peril. )

I dropped my bicycle off to get fixed today, the weather is broken because it is balmy, and I should get my contacts tomorrow. Also I sat on the cat.

And I should tell you all how absolutely glorious the film Wings of Desire is. I saw it with Dad several days ago and it is probably the best film I have seen in -- well, since Once, anyway, I think. Gorblimey. It is like a T.S. Eliot poem made visual, I am telling you -- it is beautiful, surreal, full of thoughts and philosophy, both large, poetic thoughts and little tiny fleeting human thoughts -- the whole first half of the film is almost entirely listening to people's thoughts, profound and mundane and both at once, all through the city of Berlin. It is sort of a love letter to Berlin, and it was partially inspired by Rilke (!!!), and it has both glorious solemnity and moments of absolute absurdity -- another reason it reminds me so intensely of Eliot -- Peter Falk as himself is just -- hee. And aww. And wow. Also the score is probably the best I have heard since The Illusionist, or Pan's Labyrinth, or Atonement -- ...okay, there were a lot of excellently scored films which I have seen and loved in the last year, but still. It's got cellos and surreal orchestral arrangements and one of the best choral pieces I have ever heard, and also eighties post-punk (Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds are prominently featured, and Dad was like "THIS IS THE WORST BAND EVER -- well, it was the last time I saw the film, but I have listened to more weird music since then, so it's not so bad now?" and I was like "THIS IS AWESOME I WANT MORE AKLHDHGH even if Nick Cave is, like, nancing all over the stage and making weird gyrations and stuff; also his hair is epic, but hey, eighties post-punk, also deep voice, yum") -- anyway, brilliant.

Every aspect of this film was perfect, and rather awe-inspiring, whether you are an aspiring filmmaker such as myself or just someone who really loves film. I just...this film was made for me to watch it. It's like they took a poll and found out everything I love most in a film and especially things I love most which are difficult to come by and then they put them all together. Did I mention the cinematography? It may in fact be the most magnificent and ambitious cinematography I have EVER SEEN, and I have lists in my head of films who have breathtakingly fabulous cinematography (The Illusionist I can name off the top of my head, films made by Joe Wright namely Pride & Prejudice and Atonement (I LOVE LONG PAN SHOTS OMG), Aguirre the Wrath of God (more long pan shots! I love you, seventies art-house cinema!), and hey, that Russian film which was kind of weird but also filmed in one continuous unbroken shot for, like, two hours). I mean. I can't even describe it. Colour and black and white and long pan shots and interesting angles and iconic captures and oh dear oh dear oh dear. I haven't had anything close to the flash watching anything all of this year, but watching this film I came so very, very close.

This post would sound so much more intellectual if I sounded so much less giddy and used fewer italics and internetisms. Heh.
ontology: (Default)
So, yes, I has new hair, and I love it very much. I love going to Renee at Rainbowtique, because every time, I go with only a vague idea of what I want done with my hair, and by the end I have a completely brilliant haircut that is absolutely me. All of us girls went -- only Leandra didn't get her hair cut, she just played with all of the hair on the floor and tried to attach it to her own head -- and we all look quite nice, though I haven't got pictures of everyone else.

pictures and tales of the new hair (& other things), stage i and stage ii. so, you pretty much have to read the whole post. ha ha!><div style= )
ontology: (Default)
You guys, Once is one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen. Just a simple little vignette of a story, lit from inside by the music and the sheer raw subtle emotion of it: and the cinematography was surprisingly lovely for being done on such wobbly hand-held cameras -- it had an almost accidental feel to it, as though someone only happened to be filming, and sometimes the camera would sort of trail off like a wandering mind. I really loved the scene filmed through the window of the cafe, with the reflections of the city going by over the faces of the two protagonists eating lunch, and the scene comprised of home videos/memories of the ex-girlfriend, and a lot of the bus scenes with their veering close-ups. When they sang "Falling Slowly" in the little music shop I actually got tears in my eyes, which is a never if you're me, especially as I knew the song inside-out already, and had actually viewed that scene already; the Fabulist posted a YouTube'd excerpt back when the film first came out. And the end was so simple and lovely and right that I wept and laughed all mixed up at the same time.

Also it's been raining quite magnificently much of the day; we had a truly mighty and brief thunderstorm blow down the road in the early evening. And I found my longed-after dream boots at Goodwill today -- the very tall, lace-up, heeled-but-not-pointily-so somewhat gothy boots for which I have been seeking since the age of fourteen; and there was an irresistable seven-dollar dress on a clearance rack at Rue 21. Furthermore, my mother found me an excellent tripod when she was out yard-saleing this afternoon. And since all of these elements together made it impossible to resist photographing myself, I shall also show off my New Hair.


Speaking of photographs, by the way, I've actually been putting things up on the Flickr account I created, I don't even know, a year ago? I've been doing more creative photography recently, and while I plan to go back to deviantART someday when I'm not so embarrassed about not having been there in over a year, at the moment Flickr is suiting my hey-look-I-did-something-slightly-nifty needs. So, er, go have a look, yeah?
ontology: (Default)
Ugh. SO, YOU GUYS, PRINCE CASPIAN IS THE MOST FABULOUS THING EVER AND I AM STILL GRINNING MANIACALLY EVEN THOUGH I COULDN'T STOP SMILING ALL THROUGH THE FILM ITSELF (EXCEPT FOR THE BITS WHEN I WAS CRYING, ALTHOUGH I WAS BEAMING THEN SOMETIMES TOO).

Anyway, today was the best day ever. (Today I was loud and we were all fangirly. Then we were kidnapped by the Meholick tribe, never to be seen again. It was the best day ever!) The girls and I have begun a writing club of sorts, dubbed the Quill and Ink Society, in order to improve and share our writing, and have a great deal of fun in the process. Our first meeting was today, and we handed in word prompts and then had two minutes to scribble a storybit inspired by the prompts. (Then we read them aloud. With much flourish.) Alessandra and I had already done this, which lead to her idea of making it a regular thing, with everyone -- amusingly, when I did my first one with Alessandra, most of my storybits ended up fairly wistful or gloomy (as most of my writing seems to be): today they were nearly all comical. I'm rather pleased with them, actually, and hope there's a story waiting to rise, because goodness knows I could use a short story or two under my belt!





Then we drove home and were really, really loud and fangirly all the way. And I did the dishes and would like to go scrounge up food now.
ontology: (Default)
Well, I'm back -- you know, back, although in the ordinary way I didn't actually go anywhere (except into town, and to several shops, and an ice cream place). Had a really splendid visit with my aunt & cousin, in which much hilarity was shared, and I feel a bit refreshed and a bit terrified because School is looming in front of me like a great dark thing (I like school usually, except for certain bits which I hate vehemently, and I love to learn, but it's all very intimidating, isn't it?), and, you know.


So, that was my week, and a very nice one it's been, too. And now I've got loads and loads of internet to catch up on and I have so many Firefox tabs up that my computer is beginning to smoke at the corners and apparently everyone decided that While I Was Busy was an excellent time to post lots of awesome fic, so. Will attempt to comment on everything important inasmuch as it is my power to do so. Seriously, guys, the fic. It's a conspiracy, it is. (Though even I have been unusually productive lately.)
ontology: (Default)

The reason for this post is mostly to say that Pan's Labyrinth is one of the most exquisite films I have ever seen; so brilliant and terrifying and beautiful that I am honestly not sure I can even write about it because I keep skimming about for words and can't find very many. Dad and I watched it last night (actually he was going to watch it all by himself, but I asked very nicely and he let me watch it with him), and we were both so overcome by it at the end that we didn't say anything until the credits were half over. I shook for ten minutes after it was over -- not from fear, though the film was frightening, but from sheer wonder, and a strange sort of joyous grief, or anguished joy -- as well as an immense glorious veneration for the art of it -- for the filmmaker in me, it was sort of like reading F. Scott Fitzgerald for the first time, or the way I felt after finishing Madeleine L'Engle's Two-Part Invention.

At the end I could think of nothing more than Tolkien's concept of the eucatastrophe, the 'sudden joyous turn' he speaks of in his essay On Fairy Stories -- all of the horror (and there was a lot of horror in the film -- very real horror, and if you have a weak stomach you may not want to see this film) turned towards something beautiful.

But the “consolation” of fairy-tales has another aspect than the imaginative satisfaction of ancient desires. Far more important is the Consolation of the Happy Ending. Almost I would venture to assert that all complete fairy-stories must have it. At least I would say that Tragedy is the true form of Drama, its highest function; but the opposite is true of Fairy-story. Since we do not appear to possess a word that expresses this opposite — I will call it Eucatastrophe. The eucatastrophic tale is the true form of fairy-tale, and its highest function. 
The consolation of fairy-stories, the joy of the happy ending: or more correctly of the good catastrophe, the sudden joyous “turn” (for there is no true end to any fairy-tale): this joy, which is one of the things which fairy-stories can produce supremely well, is not essentially “escapist,” nor “fugitive.” In its fairy-tale—or otherworld—setting, it is a sudden and miraculous grace: never to be counted on to recur. It does not deny the existence of dyscatastrophe, of sorrow and failure: the possibility of these is necessary to the joy of deliverance; it denies (in the face of much evidence, if you will) universal final defeat and in so far is evangelium, giving a fleeting glimpse of Joy, Joy beyond the walls of the world, poignant as grief. 

It is the mark of a good fairy-story, of the higher or more complete kind, that however wild its events, however fantastic or terrible the adventures, it can give to child or man that hears it, when the “turn” comes, a catch of the breath, a beat and lifting of the heart, near to (or indeed accompanied by) tears, as keen as that given by any form of literary art, and having a peculiar quality.

In conclusion: go see this film. The cinematography is also brilliant, and the score. Oh blimey. The main theme, as it were, is the most memorable and haunting in recent memory, I think. I've added the soundtrack to my Amazon wishlist and dearly hope someone will get it for my birthday, which is in twelve days (!!!).

ontology: (Default)
i. So, Dad came upstairs a few minutes ago to tell me that, "oh, there's going to be a Beowulf movie...with Angeline Jolie." We sort of stared at each other in an "o-kay" sort of way, and he said something about Robert Zemeckis directing, "so it might be good, because he's really brilliant," (not that I would know; I am not so well-versed in directors and I had to ask, and apparently he directed Forest Gump and Who Framed Roger Rabbit and some other stuff, which all seems about as far from Beowulf as, well...Angelina Jolie) and I'm still thinking Angeline Jolie? In Beowulf? Angeline Jolie?, because, seriously, who is there for Angelina Jolie to play? And then I thought, oh, oh, sweet Arda, is this the same Beowulf movie that Neil Gaiman did the script for? (Because there could be two totally different Beowulf films coming out in one year. Really!) So, after Dad wanders back downstairs, I had to look it up to see for myself, or I'd sit up all night trying to reconcile the two vastly different worlds of Angelina Jolie and Beowulf

I looked it up, and it is. (Right. Like I said, two Beowulf films in one year?) Robert Zemeckis, Neil Gaiman, and Angeline Jolie. As Grendel's mother. Angeline Jolie is going to play an underwater hag. I am thunderstruck, I tell you. Also, the movie is reportedly going to be done with motion-capture technology: i.e., it's all going to be animated. ("Like The Polar Express," the article said, and all I'm saying is that the animation had better be better than The Polar Express, which may have been a technical wonder, but the animation was dead boring.) 

My conclusion? This film is either going to be completely brilliant or fantastically awful.

ii. I am updating Ink & Chocolate, my Vox, every single day now. Or every weekday, anyway. It is for Scholastic Purposes. It is also rather rambly and probably sort of dull, but pop in to read once in a while, won't you? There are Bookish Thoughts. And right now there is costume-squee.
ontology: (Default)
So, one of the first things I discovered in Alyssa's family's house has been sending me into fits of geeky squeeishness.

They own what is apparently a first edition copy of T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets (published in 1943, I believe; somewhere around there, at least). Tucked inside of it are typewritten copies of 'Rhapsody on a Windy Night', 'The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock', and 'Gerontion'. Typewritten. Held together with a paper clip so old it's made grooves in the yellowing paper. I've been sporadically reading the poems since I got here whenever I have a moment in which I don't really have much else to do (which isn't often, as Alyssa and I are gadding about with cameras and costumes and occasionally our sisters).

Today, Mrs. H took us (Mum, Heidi, Alyssa, her sister Laura, and I) to the consignment shop, which as far as I can tell is like a thrift shop, with more vintage and antique items: I noticed a great deal of wonderful parlour chairs, the cloth-covered sort, with which I would love very much to furnish a home, or a dorm room. There was an exquisite vintage typewriter for only fifty dollars, and I very seriously considered buying it, but decided that if I really want a laptop and an iPod, both of which would be much more practical, I need to be a bit more sparing with large purchases such as that. I did, however, buy a wooden handbag with a nineteen twenties look to it, a soft, red-brown 'authentic velour' hat, which could fit into several eras and looks rather pleasant with my nineteen thirties dress, and--most exciting of all--a nineteen twenties flapper hat, dangling beads and all. Alyssa and I are going to take photographs of them as soon as possible, and you lot can see them when I get home. I'm completely thrilled: I adore hats madly, and it is very difficult to find them in this day and age.

We also dropped into Starbucks, which I have dearly missed, and my beloved vanilla bean creme frappuchino and I were reuniited. (Starbucks smells glorious, by the way.)

In further news, Pride & Prejudice is my new(est) favourite film. It is so beautiful that I was very nearly aching, and I must get a hold of the soundtrack as soon as possible. Amusingly, Mr. Darcy reminded me of fandom Snape, especially with his proficiency for black (and mmm, tailcoat! *drool*), and I kept expecting Lizzie to hiss fiercely, "That overgrown bat!" But oh, how lovely it was, and I must find icons immediately. Cinematography = so much love.

September 2009

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6 789 101112
13 141516 17 1819
20 21 2223242526
27 282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 04:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios